Superapps: The infrastructure layer of the AI race

In Southeast Asia, superapps such as Grab and Gojek have become core infrastructure for the regional economy. What began as ride-hailing and delivery services has expanded into ecosystems that combine logistics, financial services, and commerce. By deliberately filling gaps in local infrastructure, these platforms achieved massive reach. For millions of users, they are now part of everyday life.

Written by
Shengyi Zhang, Theresa Terzer
Published on
April 10, 2026

Superapps as quasi-sovereign infrastructure

In China, WeChat and Alipay bundle messaging, e-commerce, financial services, and even government services, and they dominate the market with little effective competition. This market power also gives them geopolitical salience. Governments in multiple countries treat WeChat as a potential channel of national influence. The United States and India, for example, have restricted its use, citing data security concerns and potential national security risks.

From market power to geopolitical salience

Despite their different home markets, Southeast Asian and Chinese superapps are now entering a new stage of evolution. Their scale and deep integration into daily routines make them strategic vehicles in the global AI race.

The next stage: AI as the scaling layer

That geopolitical dimension is visible in how these platforms are adopting AI, revealing two distinct influence models. Southeast Asian superapps, such as Grab, are partnering with leading U.S. technology firms like OpenAI to integrate AI capabilities quickly into their regional networks, effectively committing over time to a U.S.-shaped tech stack. Chinese technology companies such as Tencent, by contrast, are prioritizing their own AI models. This supports China’s goal of technological self-reliance and promotes the spread of Chinese technology standards through a vertically integrated, more closed ecosystem. In both cases, superapps can create user dependence through pervasive AI integration and broader lock-in effects that reinforce the separation of technology spheres and contribute to geopolitical bloc formation.
Superapps AI integration

Note 1: Ratings range from 0 to 1 and reflect Geolytics' assessment of the depth and breadth of AI integration across each rated dimension, based on publicly available sources (as of April 2026).

Europe's constraint: rules without chokepoints

For Europe, the implication is straightforward: regulation cannot substitute for infrastructure. In the AI era, infrastructure determines who can deliver intelligent services at scale. The key question is whether Europe can enforce its rules at the digital chokepoints through which AI is increasingly distributed: cloud services, app stores, and payment and authentication systems. As long as these layers are largely controlled from outside Europe, the challenge is less "digital sovereignty" than practical capacity to act.

Originally published on F.A.Z. in German.

Further Reading

  • Artificial Intelligence: Strategic Impact — How AI is reshaping global value chains and competitive advantages. Read more

  • Semiconductors: Global Dependencies — Understanding the chokepoints in technology supply chains. Read more

  • China Strategy Consulting — Insights on navigating China’s technology self-reliance and market regulations. Read more

  • Regulatory Risk Assessment — Europe’s evolving role in the global digital governance landscape. Read more

Curious about other topics?

All Insights & News
Timely analysis, strategic foresight, and expert perspectives on China's evolving position in the global economy.

More from: Geolytics

Geolytics

U.S. and China: The showdown no one is ready for

Geolytics

Podcast: What does tech fragmentation mean for innovation and strategy?